Peer Review Process
Agribiohealth (Journal of Agriculture, Biology & Health Sciences) applied the following peer review process policies:
- All manuscripts submitted to this journal must follow focus and scope, and author guidelines of this journal. The submitted manuscripts must address scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the focus and scope. All manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to do the similarity checking. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal by using a Turnitin software.
- The editors will review the submitted manuscript (by the author(s)). It will be evaluated and checking the manuscript's suitability with the journal's scope and conformity with the journal template. In this process, the editor communicates with the author(s) and decides the manuscript is eligible for review or decline.
- Manuscripts that have passed step 1 (above) will be sent to reviewers to review their content using the double blind review method at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers.
- The review process will consider novelty, objectivity, methods, scientific impact, conclusions, and references. The reviewers give scientific valuable comments improving the contents of the manuscript.
- Reviewers will suggest improvements and or accept/reject articles.
- The editor will decide by considering suggestions from reviewers whether the manuscript meets the requirements of the Agribiohealth Journal.
- The editor's decision is final
Final decision of articles acceptance will be made by Editors according to reviewers comments. Publication of accepted articles including the sequence of published articles will be made by Editor in Chief by considering sequence of accepted date and geographical distribution of authors as well as thematic issue.
